Live tenders / Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
7962/27 Decontamination Authorising Engineer
What the buyer is asking for
Provision of Decontamination Authorising Engineer
How this is scored
Published by the buyer. A winning response is written to these weightings, not to the question.
- 70%quality5 Point scoring 0-4 MatrixScore Classification 0 Unacceptable No response at all or insufficient information provided in the response such that it is totally un-assessable and/or incomprehensible. 1 Poor A poor response that either: - Fails to address the majority of the question; or - Addresses the majority/all of the question but with little or no relevant detail provided meaning that it lacks detail in respect of the majority/ all applicable areas, and as a result, the Authority has little confidence that the bidder has the relevant experience to deliver the Services in compliance with the Specification. 2 Satisfactory A satisfactory response that either: - Addresses all of the question with satisfactory (but not good) relevant detail provided meaning that it lacks detail in some applicable areas which causes the evaluator concern; or - Addresses the majority of the question with satisfactory (but not good) relevant detail provided meaning that it lacks detail in some applicable areas which causes the evaluator concern; and as a result, the Authority has satisfactory confidence that the bidder has the relevant experience to deliver the services in compliance with the Specification. 3 Good A good response that either: - Addresses all of the question with some good (but not excellent) relevant detail, but this does not cause concern; or - Addresses the majority of the question with excellent relevant detail provided and the parts of the question not addressed do not cause the evaluator concern; or - Addresses the majority of the question with good relevant detail provided meaning that it lacks detail in a minority of applicable areas but neither failure causes the evaluator concern; and as a result, the Authority has good confidence that the bidder has the relevant experience to deliver the services in compliance with the Specification. 4 Excellent An excellent response that addresses all of the question, with clear and excellent relevant detail giving the Authority full confidence that the bidder has the relevant experience to deliver the services in compliance with the Specification.
- 30%cost5 point scoring method 0-4 matrixScore Classification 0 Unacceptable No response at all or insufficient information provided in the response such that it is totally un-assessable and/or incomprehensible. 1 Poor A poor response that either: - Fails to address the majority of the question; or - Addresses the majority/all of the question but with little or no relevant detail provided meaning that it lacks detail in respect of the majority/ all applicable areas, and as a result, the Authority has little confidence that the bidder has the relevant experience to deliver the Services in compliance with the Specification. 2 Satisfactory A satisfactory response that either: - Addresses all of the question with satisfactory (but not good) relevant detail provided meaning that it lacks detail in some applicable areas which causes the evaluator concern; or - Addresses the majority of the question with satisfactory (but not good) relevant detail provided meaning that it lacks detail in some applicable areas which causes the evaluator concern; and as a result, the Authority has satisfactory confidence that the bidder has the relevant experience to deliver the services in compliance with the Specification. 3 Good A good response that either: - Addresses all of the question with some good (but not excellent) relevant detail, but this does not cause concern; or - Addresses the majority of the question with excellent relevant detail provided and the parts of the question not addressed do not cause the evaluator concern; or - Addresses the majority of the question with good relevant detail provided meaning that it lacks detail in a minority of applicable areas but neither failure causes the evaluator concern; and as a result, the Authority has good confidence that the bidder has the relevant experience to deliver the services in compliance with the Specification. 4 Excellent An excellent response that addresses all of the question, with clear and excellent relevant detail giving the Authority full confidence that the bidder has the relevant experience to deliver the services in compliance with the Specification.
What you must already have
Conditions of participation. These are pass or fail, so check them before writing anything.
- economic
Must be registered on the central digital platform. UK GDPR in place at time of contract. Legal Requirements • Control of Asbestos Regulation 2012 • Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 • Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 • Electricity Act 1989 • Electricity at Work Regulations 1989 • Supply of Machinery (Safety) Regulations 2008 • 7671, The IEE Wiring Regulations • British Standards and BS Code of Practice • Health & Safety at Work Act • Health Technical Memoranda • Health Building Notes • Health Facilities Notes • Model Engineering Specifications • Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Hospital Engineering Requirements • Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust Design Standards • Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust Capital Projects Energy Policy • Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust Environmental Sustainability Strategy • It is essential that the Bidder is registered and holds the following accreditations: • ISO9001 accredited • Professional Witnesses
- technical
The HTMs that are applicable to this requirement are: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/health-technical-memorandum-disinfection-and-sterilization • Health Technical Memorandum 01 • Policies and Principals of healthcare engineering (HTM 00) • The Authorising Engineer (Decontamination) will act as an independent professional adviser to the Trust. The Authorising Engineer (Decontamination) shall be appointed by Essentia on behalf of the Trust. • The Authorising Engineer (Decontamination) shall oversee Trust implementation to ensure compliance to maintain a holistic approach to the management of Decontamination safety and associated safe working practices. • The AE will act as an independent professional adviser to the Trust. The AE is appointed by the Trust in line with HTM 00 and HTM 01.
- Value
- £140,000
- Submission deadline
- 01 Dec 2026, 17:00 GMT (23 days left)
- Enquiry deadline
- Not stated
- Award decision expected by
- 06 Jan 2027, 23:59 GMT
- Contract start
- Not stated
- Contract end
- Not stated
- Category
- services
- Lots
- 1
- Procedure
- Open procedure
- CPV codes
- 71318000
- Legal basis
- 2023/54
How contested is this?
Buyers publish how many bids they received. Across 188 comparable procurements we can tell you the typical field size, how often one of these goes uncontested, and whether the buyer awards on price or on quality.
Timeline
3 published dates · Europe/London
- Tender notice publishedyesterday6 Nov 2026, 15:32 GMT
- Submission deadlinein 24 days1 Dec 2026, 17:00 GMT
- Award decision expected byin 60 days6 Jan 2027, 23:59 GMT
Commercial outcome and contract awards
Nothing awarded yet
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published
Payment terms
Monthly in arrears
Documents
How to bid
https://atamis-1928.my.site.com/s/Welcome
Submission happens on the buyer's own portal, which needs an account with them. We never handle your portal credentials.